Accounting homework help. Word limit: 1000 words
Reference style: APA Reference style
Australian syllabus
Assessment Task Description
This assignment is an in-depth analysis of accounting standard setting process and accounting practices around the globe.
The marking rubric below sets out the requirements:
Principally you will be marked on four components:
- In-depth discussion on accountings standard setting process
- In-depth discussion on global accountings practices
- In detailed analysis of whether accounting standards are set for the global practices
- Format, Presentation Quality and Demonstration of Research (10 marks for each component)
As mentioned above, Part 1 should be presented in an academic paper format.
A key aspect in your choice of format/layout should be to ensure you impart your key messages effectively (i.e., complete the requirements) and efficiently (i.e., it should be succinct and take into account the word limit).
Make sure all pages are numbered, and the text fits within the margins of your pages. make sure to include the relevant heading.
Required:
Explain why the standardisation of accounting standards on a global basis does (or does not)
necessarily equate with a standardisation in accounting practice.
Couch your discussion to cover the four points indicated above.
Marking Criteria and Rubric | ||||||||
Met | Met | Met | Met | Did not met | ||||
requirements of | requirement of | requirement of | requirement of | requirement | ||||
the learning | the learning | the learning | the learning | (0 to 49%) | ||||
outcomes a, b ,c, | outcomes a, b | outcomes a, b ,c, | outcomes a, b | |||||
d, and e to an | ,c, d, and e to a | d, and e to a | ,c, d, and e to | |||||
excellent level | very good level | good level | satisfactory | |||||
(80 to 100%) | (70 to 79%) | (60 to 69%) | level | |||||
(50 to 59%) | ||||||||
Part 1 (out of | Fully | Soundly | A good | All points | Did not cover | |||
10 marks) | researched | researched | development | were covered | all points | |||
and | and covered | of all points | ||||||
thoroughly | all points | |||||||
covered all | ||||||||
r | R | equirements | ||||||
in depth and | ||||||||
detail | ||||||||
Part 2 (out of | Fully | Soundly | A good | Did not cover | ||||
10 marks) | researched | researched | development | All points | all points | |||
and | and covered | of all points | were covered | |||||
thoroughly | all points | |||||||
covered all | ||||||||
r | R | equirements | ||||||
in depth and | ||||||||
Part 3 (out of | Fully | Soundly | A good | Did not cover | ||||
10 marks) | researched | researched | development | All points | all points | |||
and | and covered | of all points | were covered | |||||
thoroughly | all points | |||||||
covered all | ||||||||
r | R | equirements | ||||||
in depth and | ||||||||
Part 4 (out of | Proper | Proper | Basic | Poor | ||||
10 marks) | structure | structure and | structure and | Readable | grammar and | |||
language and | language and | grammar and | language | little or no | ||||
grammar and | good | evidence of | Some | research | ||||
full evidence | evidence of | research | evidence of | |||||
of supporting | research | research | ||||||
research | ||||||||
Grand Total | ||||||||
Mark (Out of | ||||||||
40) | ||||||||
Unit Mark | ||||||||
Contribution | ||||||||
(Out of 10%) | ||||||||